hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability of using observations when assessing different posture variables
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5055-0698
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Background. Working in extreme postures has been identified as a risk factor for musculoskeletal symptoms. Directly measuring work postures is considered to be the most accurate approach for assessing these exposures, but it is often not feasible to directly measure posture due to time or budget constraints. Alternatively, direct measurements of postures can be predicted based on observations of workers’ postures. Since observers are known to differ in posture ratings, it may, however, be necessary to develop calibration procedures for each specific observer.

Methods. Arm and back postures of a random sample of 28 paper mill workers were measured via inclinometry and also were assessed by three observers from videos. Linear models with participant number and observer as random effects were resolved to assess whether or not observed postures were associated with the corresponding inclinometer values and if the effect of observer on slope and intercept was significant (p<0.05). The variance explained by these models was compared to the variance explained by corresponding linear models yet with observer entered as a fixed effect (i.e. allowing different slopes and intercepts for different observers).

Results. For all postures, the variance explained was similar when using observer as a fixed compared to a random effect (R-squared ranging from 0.41 to 0.56 for observer as fixed or random effect). Throughout, participant was the major source of variance.

Discussion. Our findings of similar amounts of variance explained when using observer as a fixed compared to a random effect for all postures indicates that calibration models developed for each individual observer may not necessarily perform better than a general calibration applying to any observer. Since posture observations explained only a small proportion of directly measured posture variance, observation may not be very useful in this setting

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-21915OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-21915DiVA: diva2:942463
Conference
Ninth International Conference on the Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (PREMUS), Toronto, June 20-23, 2016
Available from: 2016-06-23 Created: 2016-06-23 Last updated: 2016-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Proceedings

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Garza, JenniferMathiassen, Svend ErikHeiden, Marina
By organisation
Department of Occupational and Public Health SciencesCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 178 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf