hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nurse staffing and renal anaemia outcomes in haemodialysis care
University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
2016 (English)In: Journal of Renal Care, ISSN 1755-6678, E-ISSN 1755-6686, Vol. 42, no 3, 185-189 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background

Current trends in renal anaemia management place greater emphasis, and thus increased workload, on the role of the nurse in haemodialysis settings. However, there is little evidence that demonstrates the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes.

Objectives

To describe nurse staffing in haemodialysis settings, its relationship with target levels of renal anaemia management and to describe target level achievement for different ways of organising anaemia management.

Design

Cross-sectional audit. Participants Forty (out of 78) haemodialysis centres in Sweden reported quality assurance data. Measurements The numbers of bedside registered nurses, licensed nurse assistants and patients undergoing haemodialysis during a predefined morning shift; type of anaemia management and achieved target levels of anaemia management.

Results

The mean patient:registered nurse ratio was 2.4 and the mean patient:nurse assistant ratio was 12.8. There were no significant relationships between registered nurse staffing and target level achievement. On average, 45.6% of the patients had haemoglobin within the target levels at centres applying nurse-driven anaemia management, compared with 47.3% at physician-driven centres.

Conclusions

These cross-sectional data suggest that renal anaemia outcomes are unrelated to the patient:registered nurse ratio. There is, however, room for improvement in renal anaemia management in the units included in this study, particularly the achievement of target levels of haemoglobin and transferrin saturation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 42, no 3, 185-189 p.
Keyword [en]
Haemodialysis, Haemoglobin, Nurse staffing, Renal anaemia, Transferrin saturation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-22133DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12167ISI: 000391014900007PubMedID: 27364918ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84982973133OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-22133DiVA: diva2:947489
Available from: 2016-07-08 Created: 2016-07-08 Last updated: 2017-04-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindberg, Magnus
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Renal Care
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf