hig.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Survivors’ Return to Work and Well-Being: Qualitative Interview Study
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science. Högskolan i Borås.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3325-4184
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg; Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6067-3520
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3668-3857
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science. Center for Clinical Research Dalarna; Department of Occupational Therapy and Healthcare Counselling, Region Dalarna.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-1483-3254
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: JMIR Cancer, E-ISSN 2369-1999, Vol. 12, article id e89954Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: About 4 in 10 people in Sweden get cancer during their lifetime, and approximately half of them will be diagnosed during their working life. As cancer survival rates improve, a growing number of individuals face challenges in returning to work following treatment. This increases the demand for effective return-to-work (RTW) strategies. Despite existing rehabilitation frameworks, cancer survivors often encounter barriers to sustainable work reintegration.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate stakeholders' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to RTW among cancer survivors, including factors promoting work-related well-being during the RTW process.

Methods: During the development phase of a work-oriented rehabilitation intervention, semistructured interviews were conducted, with 25 stakeholders involved in the RTW process: health care professionals (n=12), social insurance officers (n=7), employers (n=5), and an employment service agency officer (n=1). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Five overarching themes were identified that influenced RTW: collaboration and clear division of responsibilities, balancing individual adaptations, reducing structural barriers through support, views and expectations of the individual regarding RTW, and the emotional significance of work. Key facilitators included flexible work arrangements, individualized adaptations, a strong desire to work, and the emotional value of work. Barriers comprised lack of collaboration among stakeholders, particularly the absence of a clear division of responsibilities, as well as structural barriers, such as sick leave bureaucracy and financial obstacles. The role of rehabilitation coordinators was highlighted as pivotal in bridging gaps between stakeholders and ensuring continuity in care.

Conclusions: RTW for cancer survivors is a complex, multifactorial process requiring coordinated efforts across health care, insurance, and employment sectors. Enhancing collaboration, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities, and implementing flexible, individualized support structures are essential to facilitating cancer survivors' RTW. Additionally, including a designated coordinator in the process is proposed. More support during the early phase of RTW is necessary to reduce the risk of long-term labor market exclusion. To help cancer survivors' RTW, clear role definitions and shared responsibilities among stakeholders are essential. Flexibility in the RTW process helps individuals reintegrate at their own pace, reduces isolation, and promotes social connection. These are key considerations for future policies and support measures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR , 2026. Vol. 12, article id e89954
Keywords [en]
cancer survivors; rehabilitation; return to work; sickness absence; work participation
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work, Inkluderande arbetsliv
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-49824DOI: 10.2196/89954ISI: 001765933300001PubMedID: 42114136Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042292551OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-49824DiVA, id: diva2:2060456
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2021-01546Available from: 2026-05-18 Created: 2026-05-18 Last updated: 2026-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(277 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 277 kBChecksum SHA-512
ac01bb302a1d5452ae002c821c6f868ed00f79c4d0d75c8ab4c226440153c406781ffcfde128d692ac7cfa6bbab4fa03a69054fae92a1204cdc27ca73b363815
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fallman, Sara L.Wijk, KatarinaEfverman, AnnaEklund, LindaFessé, PerTrygged, SvenFjell, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fallman, Sara L.Wijk, KatarinaEfverman, AnnaEklund, LindaFessé, PerTrygged, SvenFjell, Maria
By organisation
Caring ScienceOccupational Health ScienceCentre for Musculoskeletal ResearchSocial Work
In the same journal
JMIR Cancer
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf