Läxhjälp as Shadow Education in Sweden: The Logic of Equality in “a School for All”Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: ECNU Review of Education, ISSN 2096-5311, E-ISSN 2632-1742, Vol. 4, no 3, p. 494-519Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Purpose: Taking läxhjälp/homework support in Sweden as a case, this article aims to further explore shadow education, especially as a pedagogical object from curriculum theory perspective.
Design/Approach/Methods: Approaches including policy analyses, ethnomethodological work based on video- recorded interaction, and narratives have produced empirically grounded knowledge. We use examples from several substudies and analyze the reentry and regulation of supplementary education and how tutors and tutees interact in tutoring settings and negotiate identities in läxhjälp as well as the relation to regular schooling.
Findings: Läxhjälp is conditioned by the logic of equality and changes in the governance of läxhjälp. The proliferation of different kinds of tutoring practices provided by various organizations calls for a broad definition of shadow education. With curriculum as boundary object, equality and academic success are foundational. Different settings and spatiotemporal arrangements affect modes of interaction, distribution of epistemic authority, and negotiations of identities.
Originality/Value: With Sweden as a case, it is possible to explore shadow education in a new context, the Scandinavian welfare state, and its history of comprehensive education. Moreover, ethnomethodological interaction and narrative studies and curriculum perspectives are seldom employed within research on shadow education. A number of critical key boundary objects are identified.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage , 2021. Vol. 4, no 3, p. 494-519
Keywords [en]
boundary object, curriculum theory, homework support, identitities, interaction, shadow education
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Innovative Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-34276DOI: 10.1177/2096531120966334ISI: 001098398000004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106424611OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-34276DiVA, id: diva2:1501414
2020-11-172020-11-172025-10-02Bibliographically approved