hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Läxhjälp as Shadow Education in Sweden: The Logic of Equality in “a School for All”
Uppsala Universitet.
Uppsala Universitet.
Uppsala Universitet.
Uppsala Universitet.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: ECNU Review of Education, ISSN 2096-5311, E-ISSN 2632-1742, Vol. 4, no 3, p. 494-519Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Taking läxhjälp/homework support in Sweden as a case, this article aims to further explore shadow education, especially as a pedagogical object from curriculum theory perspective.

Design/Approach/Methods: Approaches including policy analyses, ethnomethodological work based on video- recorded interaction, and narratives have produced empirically grounded knowledge. We use examples from several substudies and analyze the reentry and regulation of supplementary education and how tutors and tutees interact in tutoring settings and negotiate identities in läxhjälp as well as the relation to regular schooling.

Findings: Läxhjälp is conditioned by the logic of equality and changes in the governance of läxhjälp. The proliferation of different kinds of tutoring practices provided by various organizations calls for a broad definition of shadow education. With curriculum as boundary object, equality and academic success are foundational. Different settings and spatiotemporal arrangements affect modes of interaction, distribution of epistemic authority, and negotiations of identities.

Originality/Value: With Sweden as a case, it is possible to explore shadow education in a new context, the Scandinavian welfare state, and its history of comprehensive education. Moreover, ethnomethodological interaction and narrative studies and curriculum perspectives are seldom employed within research on shadow education. A number of critical key boundary objects are identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage , 2021. Vol. 4, no 3, p. 494-519
Keywords [en]
boundary object, curriculum theory, homework support, identitities, interaction, shadow education
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Innovative Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-34276DOI: 10.1177/2096531120966334ISI: 001098398000004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106424611OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-34276DiVA, id: diva2:1501414
Available from: 2020-11-17 Created: 2020-11-17 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(790 kB)199 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 790 kBChecksum SHA-512
ebf8d918c7ad790eb089440ed457e0ecf04d0f321685912f2b247f918253660de5f9d8b7f1603cfe23015f96e4a487138f220e7088fa5ea77340a5227ce59cc5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Mikhaylova, Tatiana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mikhaylova, Tatiana
By organisation
Curriculum studies
In the same journal
ECNU Review of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 199 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 903 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf