hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Success factors when implementing a structured support model for systematic work environment management in operating departments: A case study from Sweden
Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3790-3505
Uppsala universitet, Arbets- och miljömedicin.
Uppsala universitet, Arbets- och miljömedicin.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8165-7236
2022 (English)In: Journal of Nursing Management, ISSN 0966-0429, E-ISSN 1365-2834, Vol. 30, no 7, p. 3618-3627Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim The study aimed to investigate how departments in a Swedish hospital worked with a structured support model between the sessions and what they identified as success factors. Background To improve the work environment in a Swedish hospital, a structured support model for systematic work environment management was implemented in operating departments. The structured work starts with sending a web-based, open-ended, anonymous questionnaire to all employees. In response, employees describe how they perceive their work environment 'right now'. Next, a session is held where employees' viewpoints are discussed, and areas of improvement are agreed upon. Action plans are created between the sessions, and the employees start working with their plans with support from their managers. Implementing new models takes time and requires efforts from employees and managers. Method A case study was conducted, including three operating departments within a perioperative organization in a university hospital in Sweden. The participating departments had used the model without interruption during the Covid-19 pandemic 2 years after implementation, and they had created a customized working method. Three first-line managers were interviewed, and 22 action plans, 21 workplace meeting notes and two presentations were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The results are sorted under three main thematic headings: Experience of results and benefits, Marketing and cheering on and Making adjustments and making the model one's own. The results from the action plans and workplace meetings indicated that the employees had discussed problems with cooperation, work organization and how to treat each other. Conclusion Human factors, such as support, encouragement, seeing the benefits, allowing for time and respecting each other can facilitate and contribute to the implementation and success of a new model. Implications for Nursing Management The main finding of the study indicates that with a structured way of working, and with the participation of the employees in the systematic work environment work, the employees contributed with constructive suggestions for improvement. This, in turn, contributed to reducing the workload for first-line managers. In addition, when working with a structured model, deficiencies in the workplace were identified, which triggered an improvement process in the participating hospital departments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2022. Vol. 30, no 7, p. 3618-3627
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-41663DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13812ISI: 000864037800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-41663DiVA, id: diva2:1752743
Funder
Uppsala UniversityAvailable from: 2023-04-24 Created: 2023-04-24 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(776 kB)126 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 776 kBChecksum SHA-512
033b0dc76df24799fe35436c02dc72a600f9b3c2c0438dc8f65b9a3a8f3f7530efa3570cad66fcb7c2ab2d91c8eb4a9421feeea186487a9b134867f78be6e6c2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Arakelian, ErebouniMolin, FredrikSvartengren, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arakelian, ErebouniMolin, FredrikSvartengren, Magnus
In the same journal
Journal of Nursing Management
Occupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 126 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 352 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf