hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ratings of visual- and neck/shoulder discomfort during demanding simulated near work
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2919-3921
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7680-1929
2012 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Introduction

Visual discomfort and neck/shoulder discomfort is often reported among people using computers in their work. Correlation between these two symptoms categories are repor-ted in cross-sectional studies (Wiholm et al. 2007). One aim of this laboratory study was to investigate how self reported visual- and neck/shoulder discomfort develop during periods of simulated demanding near work among participants with long-term neck pain

 

Methods

Thirty-three participants with neck pain (median age 37, range 20-47) did a lab based experimental viewing task four times. Each viewing task consisted of seven minutes focusing a zebra striped pattern on a computer screen with different trial lenses (-3.5, +3.5 and 0 dipoters, randomized order). Throughout the experiment, the participant sat leaned back and relaxed in an office chair with neck support. At baseline and after every viewing task, participant rated visual- and neck/shoulder discomfort with Borg CR-10.

 Results

Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze differences between the tasks within visual- and neck/shoulder discomfort. Visual discomfort increased from baseline until after task two    (p < 0.01), and then remained at the higher level - figure 1. Neck/shoulder discomfort decreased slightly (non significant) from baseline to after task one, and then increased during the remaining tasks – figure 1. The increase was significant between task one and two, and between task three and four (p < 0.01). There was a correlation between visual- and neck/shoulder pain (Spearman rho = 0.473, p < 0.01).  

Discussion and conclusion

Both visual- and neck/shoulder discomfort increases during periods of simulated demanding near work. The reason for the increased neck/shoulder discomfort can either be the demanding near work or the static posture that participants had to maintain. Further analysis is needed to determine the cause of increased symptoms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Keywords [en]
Visual ergonomics, Accommodation, Gaze stabilization, Electromyography, Computer work
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-12656OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-12656DiVA, id: diva2:1916793
Conference
NES2012, 44th Annual Conference of the Nordic Ergonomics Society: Ergonomics for sustainability and growth
Available from: 2024-11-28 Created: 2024-11-28 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Zetterberg, CamillaRichter, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zetterberg, CamillaRichter, Hans
By organisation
Occupational Health ScienceCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf