hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Broadening and Deepening Teachers' Professional Vision through Science and Scientific Theories: A Conversation between John Dewey and Hans‐Georg Gadamer
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Educational sciences, Educational science, Curriculum studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4618-0532
2025 (English)In: Educational Theory, ISSN 0013-2004, E-ISSN 1741-5446, Vol. 75, no 1, p. 107-128Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

While some researchers argue that theories and abstract knowledge are unreliable bases for teachers' work, a wide range of research stresses the need to overcome the gap between theory and practice, or abstract academic knowledge and experience-based knowledge. Here, Silvia Edling maintains that it is relevant to ask why the relationship is necessary in the first place and in so doing revive the notions of teacher seeing in education. The purpose of this article is to contribute knowledge about the role of teacher vision by turning to how two different theoretical researchers, John Dewey and Hans-Georg Gadamer, approach the notion of vision and its related concepts in relation to science. Aided by a hermeneutic conversation, the article provides a roadmap of similarities and differences between Dewey and Gadamer that can facilitate more nuanced reflections and deliberations among teachers and educational researchers on the meaning and usefulness of stimulating a broad and deep repertoire for teacher's professional vision. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2025. Vol. 75, no 1, p. 107-128
Keywords [en]
Hans-Georg Gadamer; John Dewey; noticing; perception; science/academic knowledge; the teaching profession; vision
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-46533DOI: 10.1111/edth.12679ISI: 001420694700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217363192OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-46533DiVA, id: diva2:1937967
Available from: 2025-02-17 Created: 2025-02-17 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(230 kB)128 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 230 kBChecksum SHA-512
96d7477be9f39f2cb1e73576975074fce99f0ec7e560fd17495544b704d4a3564488366aed36056f2253a7609f76fe9937410cd593264e4f6d3dee72bd8bbec9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Edling, Silvia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edling, Silvia
By organisation
Curriculum studies
In the same journal
Educational Theory
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 129 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 790 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf