hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Fluid Intake Appraisal Inventory in adults receiving hemodialysis
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing Pamukkale University Denizli Turkey.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9711-2620
Bucak Health School, Department of Nursing Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Bucak Burdur Turkey.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6423-6010
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1289-9896
Faculty of Nursing, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing Akdeniz University Antalya Turkey.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8405-1208
2025 (English)In: Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, ISSN 1744-9979, E-ISSN 1744-9987, Vol. 29, no 3, p. 395-407Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction

Effective self-management of fluid intake in hemodialysis relies on self-efficacy. Although regular assessments with valid tools are crucial, no suitable measurement exists for the Turkish population. This study evaluates the reliability, validity, and interpretability of the Turkish version of the Fluid Intake Appraisal Inventory.

Methods

This cross-sectional study collected data from December 2021 to November 2022. It analyzed reliability, validity, and interpretability.

Results

The 202 adults receiving hemodialysis were evaluated. The scale showed high internal consistency with Cronbach α = 0.954 and good test–retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.975, 95% confidence interval: 0.786–0.992, and no measurement error. It demonstrated excellent content validity with scale level content validity index ≥0.90 and good construct validity with a negative moderate correlation to interdialytic weight gain. For structural validity, the model fit indices were χ2/df = 5.7, root mean square error of approximation = 0.15, goodness of fit indexes = 0.58, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.57, comparative fit index = 0.6, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.10.

Conclusion

This inventory is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-efficacy in fluid intake among the Turkish hemodialysis population.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2025. Vol. 29, no 3, p. 395-407
Keywords [en]
cross-sectional studies; psychometrics; renal dialysis; self-efficacy; treatment adherence and compliance
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
no Strategic Research Area (SFO)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-46606DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.70003ISI: 001480833800004PubMedID: 40047075Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000476544OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-46606DiVA, id: diva2:1943494
Available from: 2025-03-11 Created: 2025-03-11 Last updated: 2025-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindberg, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yangöz, Şefika TuğbaCeylan, HaticeLindberg, MagnusÖzer, Zeynep
By organisation
Caring Science
In the same journal
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf