hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Classification of Power Quality Disturbances Using Convolutional Neural Network and Temporal Convolutional Network Models
NIT Tiruchirappalli,Dept. of EEE,Tiruchirappalli,India.
NIT Tiruchirappalli,Dept. of EEE,Tiruchirappalli,India.
NIT Tiruchirappalli,Dept. of EEE,Tiruchirappalli,India.
NIT Tiruchirappalli,Dept. of EEE,Tiruchirappalli,India.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: 2024 23rd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), IEEE , 2024, p. 1-6Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Power quality disturbances (PQDs) have adverse effects on the performance of the electrical equipment and the overall system reliability, and therefore, the detection and diagnosis of PQDs are crucial. Typically, PQDs are classified as batch processing, where a PQD is detected for every 10 fundamental cycles (i.e., 200 ms). Nonetheless, the classification of PQD for every instant gives vital information and can be an online process. This paper presents a deep learning-based model for detecting and classifying 18 PQDs in a noisy environment using 1D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN). The CNN and TCN facilitate the automatic extraction of meaningful features from the input PQD signals as they evade the typical three-stage classification approach using signal processing techniques. This leads to minimal computational burden and faster classification. Furthermore, the TCN has an additional feature of continuous detection of PQDs at each instant. The performance of the classifiers is measured in terms of classification accuracy and test time. A comparative analysis is performed with a CNN to provide a better insight into the merits of the proposed TCN model. The CNN model outperformed the TCN model by accurately classifying the signal under 20 dB noise. However, the TCN has the advantage of detecting the disturbances at every sample averaged over four samples (i.e., 1.25 ms), whereas the CNN outputs for every 200 ms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE , 2024. p. 1-6
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-46899DOI: 10.1109/npsc61626.2024.10987033ISI: 001551747800071Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105007421073ISBN: 979-8-3315-1956-8 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-46899DiVA, id: diva2:1959985
Conference
23rd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC),Indore, India, 14-16 December 2024
Available from: 2025-05-22 Created: 2025-05-22 Last updated: 2025-10-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Telagam Setti, Sunilkumar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Telagam Setti, Sunilkumar
By organisation
Electronics
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 122 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf