hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing teachers’ experiences of innovative and traditional learning spaces: what’s going on?
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Educational sciences, Educational science. (ROLE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1871-4488
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Educational sciences, Educational science, Curriculum studies. (ROLE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0331-8482
Newcastle University, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6698-3976
2025 (English)In: Learning Environments Research, ISSN 1387-1579, E-ISSN 1573-1855, Vol. 28, p. 711-731Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The physical spaces of education are not neutral containers but influential parts of the total learning environment. Teachers’ pedagogical decisions are made partly on the basis of the availability and organization of material and digital resources. However, teacher understandings, both individual and shared, of the possibilities offered by learning spaces are key to their full use. Therefore the provision of more versatile spaces, where groupings and activities can be varied, may not result in the intended educational innovations of collaborative teaching and student-centred learning. This paper answers the need to discover how educational spaces with such designs are being understood and used by teachers. This research used the OECD’s staff survey to investigate teachers’ views and their reported use of spaces in a sample of Swedish schools with either a traditional or innovative design. Alongside many similarities in responses across the two types of school design, we found slight differences in use of space, according to school type. This evidence that teachers are indeed recognising and exploiting the possibilities of these new designs is important for Swedish municipalities and other funders globally that are investing in such schools. It is also necessary to consider the limitations to pedagogical innovation that our findings suggest in order to develop better understanding of the design and use of twenty-first century schools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2025. Vol. 28, p. 711-731
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-48009DOI: 10.1007/s10984-025-09550-3Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105011181897OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-48009DiVA, id: diva2:1985772
Available from: 2025-07-28 Created: 2025-07-28 Last updated: 2025-11-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1035 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1035 kBChecksum SHA-512
11eace93051b470ab00fd61dbc9572bb1a25640a39d755ce623331a25397d4240babba6ac7c26eb052aa375a7e2cebff7bb37b06fb4c8f3200b8007d4babedfb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Frelin, AnneliGrannäs, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Frelin, AnneliGrannäs, JanWoolner, Pamela
By organisation
Educational scienceCurriculum studies
In the same journal
Learning Environments Research
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf