hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Environmental performance of type IV hydrogen storage systems
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science.
2025 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Adopting hydrogen as an energy carrier represents an important step towards a more sustainable future in energy production and utilisation on an industrial scale. Owing to the importance of hydrogen as an energy carrier, it is paramount to design and manufacture efficient storage systems that can cope with the chemical properties of hydrogen and can ensure a sustainable utilisation of hydrogen. In this paper the focus is on type IV gaseous hydrogen (H2) storage tanks covered with a carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) layer, and in this respect, a life cycle analysis (LCA) modelling in Simapro will be conducted for this type of tank. Afterwards we will perform an LCA sensitivity analysis under the scenarios that the tank’s CFRP layer is replaced, firstly by a glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) layer and, secondly, by a basalt fibre reinforced plastic (BFRP) layer. The results of our LCA for the type IV H2 storage tank show that, during the life cycle of this tank, the use stage has the biggest climate impact, followed by the manufacturing and disposal stages. The results of our LCA sensitivity analysis reveal the following: CFRP tanks exhibit the highest environmental impact throughout their whole life cycle when compared to GFRP and BFRP tanks because during the manufacturing process, manufacturing of carbon fibres will generate more CO2 emissions and have more energy demands than glass and basalt fibres. During the life cycle of each type of tank, more non-renewable energy is consumed than renewable energy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. , p. 88
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-48539OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-48539DiVA, id: diva2:1999339
Subject / course
Sustainability science
Educational program
Master in Sustainability Science – Environment and Decision Making
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2025-09-19 Created: 2025-09-19 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2869 kB)416 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2869 kBChecksum SHA-512
de36a09416de27a7a8b2dd049af02e16ad5c666e3ac6dfefc477282ed5ab7ea510716408590e469d4e1f82bf49479080657b9cc611da967c078156821b18896e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 416 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 359 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf