hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A taxonomy of biodiversity indicators for evaluating supply chain sustainability
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Management, Industrial Design and Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Management. Göteborgs universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5336-827X
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, USA; Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, France.
Saito University College, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
2026 (English)In: Supply chain management, ISSN 1359-8546, E-ISSN 1758-6852Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Purpose

This study aims to identify biodiversity indicators and develop a corresponding taxonomy for businesses and sustainable supply chain research. It also clarifies how biodiversity indicators support the long-term resilience and sustainability of supply chains in general. A framework is introduced to delineate the relationships among biodiversity indicators for researchers, practitioners and policymakers.

Design/methodology/approach

A multi-stage methodology was used, including iterative consolidation, theoretical mapping and generative AI-powered data mining. An intuitive taxonomy and framework development process helped guide the analysis. Indicators were organized through an inductive approach and structured within a drivers–pressures–state–impact–response model, followed by cross-validation through a targeted literature review.

Findings

A total of 249 biodiversity indicators were identified and classified into 10 main categories and 30 subcategories. These categories make explicit how biodiversity is linked to supply chain risk and resilience, ranging from ecosystem functions and services to governance and response indicators. Major dimensions include methodology, governance, genetic diversity, species, habitat, ecosystem functions, services and pressures. The drivers–pressures–state–impact–response framework provides a logical, process-oriented set of relationships between indicators and demonstrates how the taxonomy can align with established reporting and policy frameworks.

Originality/value

This study lays a foundation for evaluating sustainable supply chain performance using biodiversity indicators, supporting academics, practitioners and policymakers in advancing supply chain management. It also offers a framework for evidence-based biodiversity management within organizational supply chains, although practical implementation remains an important area for future investigation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald , 2026.
Keywords [en]
Supply chain management, Sustainability, Biodiversity indicators, Biodiversity taxonomy
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-50325DOI: 10.1108/scm-05-2025-0479ISI: 001782333100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-50325DiVA, id: diva2:2076021
Available from: 2026-06-20 Created: 2026-06-20 Last updated: 2026-06-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Sorooshian, Shahryar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sorooshian, Shahryar
By organisation
Industrial Management
In the same journal
Supply chain management
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf