hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measuring Accountable Information in CSR Reports: A New Operationalization and Analysis Applied to Greenhouse Gas Disclosures
Högskolan Dalarna, Mikrodataanalys.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2952-7327
Högskolan Dalarna, Mikrodataanalys.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2317-9157
2024 (English)In: Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, ISSN 1554-1908, E-ISSN 1558-7940, Vol. 21, no 1, p. 59-88Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We develop a novel and generic text-based measure to classify and evaluate greenhouse gas (GHG) disclosures. We construct the measure using collocation analysis of GHG-related words and regular expressions. Automated implementation achieved high concordance compared to manual investigations. We move beyond the “bag-of-words” approach in classifying voluminous nonfinancial corporate disclosure. We also outline a methodology that is manyfold scalable and makes replicability straightforward. Compared to past studies, we work with a significantly larger sample of 5,017 reports across 80 countries, thereby dealing with greater complexity and leading to better generalizability. We also contribute to the debate on whether nonfinancial disclosures exhibit accountability or are merely greenwashing. We find a negative trend in accountability worldwide, and firm-level accountability in GHG disclosures is not detectable in a country-level reduction of GHG emissions. Moreover, firms disclose significantly higher accountable information in a civil-law legal environment compared to those in a common-law legal environment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Accounting Association , 2024. Vol. 21, no 1, p. 59-88
Keywords [en]
greenhouse gas, accountability, text mining, CSR, institutional environment
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-50889DOI: 10.2308/jeta-2022-002ISI: 001198272500004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204360233OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-50889DiVA, id: diva2:2095523
Available from: 2024-02-10 Created: 2026-08-26 Last updated: 2026-08-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Corporate Disclosures Regulations: Social Solution or a Problem?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Corporate Disclosures Regulations: Social Solution or a Problem?
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Regulations are argued to have the answer to solving various social and economic problems that society faces today (e.g., climate change, tax evasion, etc.). However, regulations may instead become the problem (e.g., overregulation). The central research question of this doctoral thesis is “are corporate disclosures regulations a social solution or a problem?” 

To answer the central research question, Papers I and II examine the economic effects of an EU-wide audit reform, the Annual Accounts Directive: 2013/34/EU, on firms and the society. Papers III, IV, and V examine firm behavior to assess the need for public regulation of nonfinancial reporting in the light of an EU-wide reform, the Nonfinancial Reporting Directive: 2014/95/EU, commonly known as the NFRD.

The thesis posits that the current implementations of these reforms in some settings are imperfect and thus costly for the firms and society. It recommends deregulation of the monitoring of financial disclosure, i.e., to allow more small firms the option of deciding if an audit is beneficial for them or not. On the other hand, recommends a different approach for regulating nonfinancial reporting, e.g., sustainability reporting. For instance, regulations that can influence firms’ governance structure, e.g., board diversity. A firm with a diverse board is more likely to adopt a sustainability agenda which is better aligned with the expectations of the EU regulators. 

Stakeholders use firms’ disclosures to evaluate its performance and behavior for various decision making. For example, shareholders, in their investing or divesting decisions; analysts, in making various forecasts and recommendations; or governments, in assessing the need for reforms. Historically, stakeholders commonly used financial information for these types of decision making. Hence, there are well established generic measures to evaluate firms’ financial information (e.g., earnings quality measures and financial-statement ratios). Nowadays, stakeholders are increasingly using firms’ sustainability related information in their decision-making process as well. However, replicable and scalable generic measures to evaluate such information are missing. This thesis develops objective approaches and a generic measure, to evaluate firms’ sustainability related disclosures. The developed approaches for analyzing unstructured text data may be applied to other fields that can benefit from the use of natural language processing tools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borlänge: Dalarna University, 2021
Keywords
audit choice, audit regulations, corporate governance, corporate sustainability, EU-wide accounting reforms, firm growth, greenhouse gas emissions, machine learning, microdata analysis, natural learning processing, new institutional economics, nonfinancial reporting, survey
National Category
Business Administration Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-50884 (URN)978-91-88679-16-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-11-12, Room 311, Borlänge, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-08-26 Created: 2026-08-26 Last updated: 2026-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Huq, Asif MCarling, Kenneth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Huq, Asif MCarling, Kenneth
In the same journal
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf